Sandaysoft

Support forum for Cumulus weather station software
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 8:24 pm
Please click here before posting. Help me to help you!
Useful Links: Cumulus FAQ • Enhancement requests • Wiki (documentation)
Please put your approximate location into your profile
Add your web site to the Cumulus user map
Vantage Pro2 users with firmware 3.00 should upgrade to fw 3.12 and Cumulus 1.9.4

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Weather Station: WS-1090
Operating System: windows XP sp3
Ok, I've placed my station approximately 10 feet off the ground, with nothing closer than 50 feet to it. Sounds good so far, right? Well, my station reported a low temp of 36F, but I had frozen plants in my garden. So, next nite, same thing, except I put a min/max in the garden on the edge of a raised bed (6 inches off the ground). Station read 36, min/max read 32.

So.....how do I deal with this. Do I just adjust mentally? The distance from top of tower to where the temp needs to be taken is nearly 50 feet. If I put the station lower, weather and water readings will be affected.

Should I consider drinking decaf.... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:37 pm
Posts: 1846
Location: Dudley, West Midlands, UK
Weather Station: None !
Operating System: XP SP3
Quote:
10 feet off the ground,
It should be approx. 4 ft 6in from the ground (approx. 'old' head height')

'Grass' temperatures should be lower (at night) than air temperature by a few degrees.

_________________
Image
......................Imagine, what you will KNOW tomorrow !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 443
Location: GA, USA
Weather Station: WS2080
Operating System: W7
I had my unit up higher and as already posted, my temperatures did not match up till I lowered it. I assume too your unit is over grass, not a solid surface like concrete.

_________________
Georgia Home Orchard

http://georgiahomeorchard.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:37 pm
Posts: 1846
Location: Dudley, West Midlands, UK
Weather Station: None !
Operating System: XP SP3
Quote:
I assume too your unit is over grass,
In an ideal world it SHOULD be over grass ;)

_________________
Image
......................Imagine, what you will KNOW tomorrow !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Weather Station: WS-1090
Operating System: windows XP sp3
Where is this ideal world? I'd like to go there.

I'm structure limited in terms of placement. I can lower it, though not to the 4' 6" mark (where did you get that reference BTW). I'm not over grass because this is Texas in the middle of it's worst drought in history, there is no such thing as grass left around here. I have an acre of ground, and the station is effectively in the middle of it. The land slopes about 20 feet in height from west side down to east side, so my location is in the middle for distance and slope. As "average" of spot as I could make it. I'm growing things in most locations on the property, either crops or fruit trees. I think I am going to have to do a basic temperature map of different places since taking the temp from one place isn't going to give me reliable enough readings for every place I need to measure it. I'll take my min/max and set it in different places and compare it to what the fix station says. I don't care about heat differences, hot is hot. But frost/freeze is not good.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 38
Location: Cornwall, England
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2
Operating System: Windows XP
There is some useful information on weather recording on the UK Met Office website and in particular in factsheet 17 at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/k/5/Fact_sheet_No._17.pdf. Amongst many other things, the factsheet refers to the different positions of temperature measurements and suggests that the grass surface can be artificial.

Is there anyone on this forum who has their weather station sited according to all these requirements? Mine definitely isn't!

Factsheet 17 has been referred to in previous topics on this forum.

_________________
Graham

Weather in Poundstock, Cornwall, England


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:37 pm
Posts: 1846
Location: Dudley, West Midlands, UK
Weather Station: None !
Operating System: XP SP3
Image :lol:

_________________
Image
......................Imagine, what you will KNOW tomorrow !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 249
Location: Harwich, Essex
Weather Station: Technoline WS-2350
Operating System: Windows XP SP3,
I am afraid that if I were to lower my temperature sensor to the recommended height I may start getting more problems then with the transmitting and receiving :bash:

_________________
Regards,

Geoff


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 443
Location: GA, USA
Weather Station: WS2080
Operating System: W7
jferristx, I too grow fruit trees here in South Ga. Our drought is getting bad too. Note Cumulus tracks chill hours.

I have citrus and apple trees. What are you growing?

_________________
Georgia Home Orchard

http://georgiahomeorchard.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:28 am
Posts: 2
Location: Western Oregon, USA
Weather Station: Ambient Weather WS-1080
Operating System: Windows 7 ver 6.1 SP1
There are many, varying requirements for weather data, so you will likely find that one size does not fit all. I worked half my career in aviation weather and the other half in forestry weather. The needs of the two are vastly different. So, I suggest you consider what is most important for you. If your main concern is the garden, put the temperature sensor where it will most represent what is going on there. If your desire is to provide "standard" weather observations to supplement national weather networks, then try to duplicate their siting. You may even find that you need two temperature sensors at different heights to satisfy your needs. But you want your station to be representative. In other words if you live in west Texas, don't put the sensors near the swimming pool where humidity will be grossly out of whack. Don't put the temperature sensor near the dryer vent or air conditioner. Try to get the wind sensors away from anything that will shadow the true wind or induce turbulence. All in all a difficult task at best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:13 am
Posts: 349
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Weather Station: La Crosse WS 2306
Operating System: Windows 7 64 Bit
Hi
Just to add, I am in a suburban environment, and to get accurate readings I could not achieve this at one location. Instead I use 2 sensors and combine the min and max figures using the correct ones to close to ideal min and max figures for each day. One sensor reads too mild by night as its too protected but is correct during the day, with the other sensor more exposed on the north side of the house and reads overnight figures better but wrong for daytime with the heat of day ( with too high temp). For me that solves the problem siting my sensor in a good spot. I don't have any trouble siting my wind sensor and rain sensor on the top of a greenhouse as its virtually at the roofline and almost unobstructed from good airflow.

_________________
Regards, Matt of Brisbane, Australia
Web Site: http://www.localweatherdata.0glo.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:54 pm
Posts: 61
Location: Taunton somerset United Kingdom
Weather Station: WH-3080
Operating System: windows vista
This is a hard one.
My garden is about 80 feet long and from the top of the garden to the bottom i get a temperature difference of approx 0.7 celcius. Sometimes the measurements are the same.
Now the temp gauge at the bottom of the garden always seems to be pretty accurate when it comes to frosts and comparing with other stations locally. Both sensors are the same hight as each other and both are over grass. So i am guessing that my garden has its own micro climate. I personally think that in general most of our readings are accurate to the positioning of our gauges but will never always be the same as the met office or other places because of the micro climates we have in various degrees around our stations.
I believe that your sensor should be approx 1200mm above the ground , which is about four feet.

_________________
Richard
http://www.taunton-weather.co.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Station placement contradiction
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:13 am
Posts: 349
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Weather Station: La Crosse WS 2306
Operating System: Windows 7 64 Bit
Hi
You will generally get frost in hollows and low spots where the temperature is lower. Your microclimate would affect the readings if not just a open area. As you said the sensor should be 1.2 m and over grass.

_________________
Regards, Matt of Brisbane, Australia
Web Site: http://www.localweatherdata.0glo.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group